Quick

Edward Torres v. Quick, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20251:22-cv-01536California1,872 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD TORRES, Case No. 1:22-cv-01536-KES-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S v. REMAINING CLAIM IN THIS CASE BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE QUICK, et al.,

AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

Defendants. ORDER OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS 17 (ECF No. 100)

19 Plaintiff Edward Torres is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 20 lawsuit filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 12). Following summary judgment as to 21 certain defendants, this case now proceeds on solely on Plaintiff’s 14th Amendment Claim Against Defendant Ontiveros for Deliberate Indifference to his Serious Medical Needs. On September 30, 2025, Defendant Ontiveros filed a motion to compel certain discovery responses, or in the alternative, a motion to dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.