Singh
BMO Bank N.A. v. K&K Trans Inc, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 BMO BANK N.A., Case No. 1:25-cv-00725-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT K&K
12] v. TRANS INC ONLY 13 K&K TRANS INC, et al., (ECF No. 29) 14 Defendants. 15 16 On December 8, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice 1g as te Defendant K&K Trans Inc only. (ECF No. 29). Defendant K&K Trans Inc has not filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, in light of the notice, the case against Defendant K&K Trans Inc has ended and is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)@); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Defendant K&K Trans Inc as a 22 defendant on the docket. Further, the Clerk of Court is directed to amend the case caption from 23 “BMO Bank N.A. v. K & K Trans Inc et al” to “BMO Bank N.A. v. Singh.” IT IS SO ORDERED. * …