(HC)Oganesian
Grigor Oganesian v. Warden of California City Detention Center
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRIGOR OGANESIAN, No. 1:25-cv-01667-DC-EFB (PC) Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA CITY
DETENTION CENTER,
15 Respondent.
17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court has conducted a preliminary review of 19 the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 20 2254. Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of 21 constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to show cause why the writ should not 22 be granted by filing an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this order. See 28 U.S.C. § 23 2243. Petitioner may file a reply/traverse to the answer/return within 7 days after being served a 24 copy of it. 25 ////
Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of the rules to…