Bright People Foods dba Dr. McDougall’s Right Foods v. Alliance Sales & Marketing MW, Inc. and Does 1 to 20
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 BRIGHT PEOPLE FOODS DBA DR. No. 2:24-cv-00060 WBS AC 13 MCDOUGALL’S RIGHT FOODS,
14 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF
15 vs. SCHEDULING ORDER 16 ALLIANCE SALES & MARKETING MW, INC., and DOES 1 TO 20, 17 Defendants. 18
R & M INNOVATIONS LLC,
19 Plaintiff, 20 vs. 21
ALLIANCE SALES & MARKETING MW,
22 INC., and DOES 1 TO 20, 23 Defendants. 24 ----oo0oo---- 25 Before the court is defendants’ motion to modify the 26 Scheduling Order. (Docket No. 38.) Federal Rule of Civil 27 Procedure 16(b)(4) allows the court to modify its scheduling 28 1 order for good cause. The “good cause” standard focuses 2 primarily on the diligence of the party seeking the amendment. 3 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.3d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 4 1992). “Although the existence or degree of prejudice to the 5 party opposing the modification might supply additional reasons 6 to deny a motion, the focus of the inquiry is upon the moving 7 party’s reasons for seeking modification.” Id. 8 Defendants’ counsel requests…