Bright People Foods dba Dr. McDougall’s Right Foods v. Alliance Sales & Marketing MW, Inc. and Does 1 to 20

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20252:24-cv-00060California621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 BRIGHT PEOPLE FOODS DBA DR. No. 2:24-cv-00060 WBS AC MCDOUGALL’S RIGHT FOODS,

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF

vs. SCHEDULING ORDER ALLIANCE SALES & MARKETING MW, INC., and DOES 1 TO 20, 17 Defendants.

R & M INNOVATIONS LLC,

19 Plaintiff, 20 vs.

ALLIANCE SALES & MARKETING MW,

INC., and DOES 1 TO 20, Defendants. 24 ----oo0oo---- 25 Before the court is defendants’ motion to modify the 26 Scheduling Order. (Docket No. 38.) Federal Rule of Civil 27 Procedure 16(b)(4) allows the court to modify its scheduling 28 order for good cause. The “good cause” standard focuses 2 primarily on the diligence of the party seeking the amendment. 3 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.3d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 4 1992). “Although the existence or degree of prejudice to the 5 party opposing the modification might supply additional reasons 6 to deny a motion, the focus of the inquiry is upon the moving 7 party’s reasons for seeking modification.” Id. 8 Defendants’ counsel requests…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.