Bright People Foods dba Dr. McDougall’s Right Foods v. Alliance Sales & Marketing MW, Inc. and Does 1 to 20
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 BRIGHT PEOPLE FOODS DBA DR. No. 2:24-cv-00060 WBS AC MCDOUGALL’S RIGHT FOODS,
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF
vs. SCHEDULING ORDER ALLIANCE SALES & MARKETING MW, INC., and DOES 1 TO 20, 17 Defendants.
R & M INNOVATIONS LLC,
19 Plaintiff, 20 vs.
ALLIANCE SALES & MARKETING MW,
INC., and DOES 1 TO 20, Defendants. 24 ----oo0oo---- 25 Before the court is defendants’ motion to modify the 26 Scheduling Order. (Docket No. 38.) Federal Rule of Civil 27 Procedure 16(b)(4) allows the court to modify its scheduling 28 order for good cause. The “good cause” standard focuses 2 primarily on the diligence of the party seeking the amendment. 3 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.3d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 4 1992). “Although the existence or degree of prejudice to the 5 party opposing the modification might supply additional reasons 6 to deny a motion, the focus of the inquiry is upon the moving 7 party’s reasons for seeking modification.” Id. 8 Defendants’ counsel requests…