Mansoor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AAMIR SALADIN RUSHDAN, No. 2:24-cv-2183 CSK P

Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

Y. MANSOUR, et al., Defendants. 16 On October 31, 2025, defendant Y. Mansour filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Local Rule 230(l). On April 15, 2025, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may constitute grounds for denial of the motion. (ECF No. 22 at 7-8 (citing Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc)).) Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff…