Castillo

Aaron Castillo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. dba T-Mobile, a Delaware corporation; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20252:25-cv-02208California1,084 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo----

AARON CASTILLO, on behalf of No. 2:25-cv-2208-WBS-SCR himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE USE, INC. dba T- MOBILE, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 18 Defendant.

20 ----oo0oo----

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER

22 After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the 23 court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference 24 scheduled for December 15, 2025, and makes the following findings 25 and orders without needing to consult with the parties any 26 further.

I. SERVICE OF PROCESS

28 All defendants have been served, and no further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings will be permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). See Johnson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.