Alisa Razumovsky v. Nelnet Servicing LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20252:25-cv-02257California394 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALISA RAZUMOVSKY, Case No. 2:25-cv-02257-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AS PREMATURE

NELNET SERVICING LLC,

Defendant. (ECF No. 10) 16 Plaintiff Alisa Razumovsky, who is proceeding pro se, has moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action. (ECF No. 2.) After determining whether IFP is appropriate and granting IFP, the Court must screen the complaint and dismiss any claims that are frivolous or malicious, fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief against an immune defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). On November 18, 2025, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 9.) Therefore, the First Amended Complaint is the operative complaint. On November 26, 2025, Defendant Nelnet Servicing, LLC filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 10.) However, the First Amended Complaint has not yet been screened, thus, the Court has not yet determined…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.