Parker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWNDA MOLLISON-SAPIER, No. 2:25-cv-2388 DJC CSK P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LAVELLE PARKER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 31, 2025, petitioner was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations. Thirty days have now passed, and petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. Accordingly, as discussed below, the petition should be dismissed with prejudice because it is barred by the statute of limitations. I. GOVERNING STANDARDS Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 provides for summary dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in…