Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 JANE T.C. DOE, an individual, No. 2:25-cv-2580-WBS-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

TO DISMISS AND/OR TRANSFER

G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC, ET AL., Defendants. 17 ----oo0oo---- 18 This matter is before the court on defendants’ motions 19 to dismiss pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) for 20 lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, failure to state a 21 claim upon which relief can be granted. Because plaintiff failed 22 to file timely opposition, the court takes the motions under 23 consideration without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(c). And 24 because the court finds it lacks personal jurisdiction over any 25 of the defendants, it does not reach the motions to dismiss for 26 improper venue or failure to state a claim. 27 Rule 12(b)(2) provides for dismissal of an action when 28 the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2). A plaintiff bears the burden of 3 …