Tackitt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONIQUE ALISSA-JOY TACKITT, No. 2:25-cv-3145 DC AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT TACKITT and CEDRIC

TACKITT,

15 Defendants.

17 On October 30, 2025, plaintiff filed this action in pro se and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. The case was accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The undersigned reviewed the complaint and, believing that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear plaintiff’s case, issued an Order to Show Cause requiring that plaintiff respond and demonstrate that federal jurisdiction exists. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff did not respond. Because it is clear from the complaint that federal jurisdiction does not exist, the undersigned recommends that this case be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377, (1994). In 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332(a), “Congress…