Ludwin Edenilson Ventura Ramirez v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUDWIN EDENILSON VENTURA No. 1:25-cv-1775-DC-CKD P

RAMIREZ,

12 Petitioner, 13 ORDER v. 14

WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE

15 ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY, et al., 16 Respondents. 17 18 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is currently representing himself, filed a petition 19 for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, 20 and a motion to appoint counsel. Although petitioner also paid the filing fee, the application to 21 proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing and is granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 22 The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the 23 Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.1 In light of the complexity of the 24 legal issues involved, the court has determined the interests of justice require appointment of 25 counsel and the motion to appoint counsel will be granted. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see 26

27 1 Rule 1(b) of the Rules…