Lawrence

Kaitlyn Lawrence v. Finicity Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20252:23-cv-01005California3,719 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAITLYN LAWRENCE, No. 2:23-cv-01005-DJC-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER

FINICITY CORPORATION,

15 Defendant. 16 In 2023, Plaintiff Kaitlyn Lawrence filed a Complaint on behalf of herself and other consumers regarding an application, website, or online or Internet service provided by Defendant Finicity Corporation. After Finicity moved to compel arbitration of Plaintiff’s claims, this Court denied the motion, concluding that Plaintiff had not consented to arbitration as she lacked adequate notice of the User Agreement containing the arbitration provision. The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded, finding there was valid consent and directing this Court to analyze, in the first instance, whether there was sufficient consideration to support the User Agreement. For the reasons stated below, because the Court finds there is sufficient consideration, Finicity’s motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED. //// //// BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.