Serrano

Nicholas Serrano by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Jose Anthony Serrano v. City of Stockton, County of San Joaquin, California, State of California, Does 1-10, Moes 1-50, and Roes 1-50

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20252:24-cv-00442California587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 NICHOLAS SERRANO BY AND No. 2:24-cv-00442-JAM-CSK

THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD

LITEM, JOSE ANTHONY SERRANO, Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART AND

v. DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS CITY OF STOCKTON, COUNTY OF

SAN JOAQUIN, CALIFORNIA,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES 1- 10, MOES 1-50, AND ROES 1-50, 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Nicholas Serrano filed the present action on September 27, 2023, in the San Joaquin County Superior Court, asserting six causes of action against Defendants City of Stockton, County of San Joaquin, Does 1–10, Moes 1–50, and Roes 1–50 for: (1) negligence; (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (3) assault; (4) battery; (5) negligent hiring, supervision, and retention; and (6) violation of the Fourth Amendment under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. On February 9, 2024, City of Stockton removed the case to federal court under federal question jurisdiction. Id. The Court dismissed 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.