Tevis

Nancy Ellen Tevis v. Dyson Direct, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20252:25-cv-00821California2,360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NANCY ELLEN TEVIS, No. 2:25-cv-00821-DJC-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER

DYSON DIRECT, INC.,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Defendant Dyson Direct, Inc., moves to strike Plaintiff Nancy Tevis’s class allegations in her Complaint. (ECF No. 26.) Dyson also moves to stay discovery pending resolution of the Motion to Strike. (ECF No. 29.) For the reasons explained below, the Motion to Strike is DENIED. The Motion to Stay is DENIED as moot. BACKGROUND On April 26, 2024, Plaintiff Nancy Tevis purchased Defendant Dyson Direct, Inc.’s Big Ball Multi Floor Canister Vacuum (the “Product”) on Amazon.com. (Compl. (ECF No. 1) ¶¶ 6, 13.) Eight days later, on May 4, 2024, the Product was delivered to Plaintiff. (Id. ¶ 14.) Plaintiff alleges that the Product’s express warranty states: “Your Dyson machine is warranted against original defects in materials and workmanship for a period of 5 years from the date of purchase.” (Id. ¶ 15.) Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.