Leo B. Turner, Jr. v. Yolo Police Department, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20252:25-cv-01417California307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEO B. TURNER, Jr., No. 2:25-cv-1417-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER YOLO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Leo B. Turner, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this matter, which was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 22, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 14 days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.