Pfieffer

Adam Jay Stone v. Anderson, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20251:21-cv-01461California695 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO STAY EXECUTION OF BILL OF COSTS

v. (ECF No. 337) ANDERSON, et al., Defendants. 16 On May 1, 2025, judgment was entered in favor of Defendants following a jury trial on Plaintiff’s excessive force claims. (ECF Nos. 310, 311.) On May 7, 2025, Defendants submitted a bill of costs. (ECF No. 312.) Plaintiff filed objections to the bill of costs on May 23, 2025. (ECF No. 315.) Pursuant to court order, Defendants filed a reply on June 3, 2025. (ECF No. 322.) On June 5, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal (ECF No. 323.) The notice of appeal was processed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and assigned Case Number 25-3589.1 (ECF Nos. 324, 325.) On June 11, 2025, the Court issued an order taxing counts in the amount of $1,807.50. (ECF No. 327.) On July 7, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion to stay the execution of the bill of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.