Anil Kumar v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANIL KUMAR, No. 1:25-cv-01709-DAD-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE

ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY,

15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 19 is granted. 20 The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the 21 Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254. In light of the complexity of the 22 legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require the appointment 23 of counsel for petitioner. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 24 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Within seven days from the date of this order, the appointing authority 25 for the Eastern District of California shall identify counsel and send counsel’s contact information

Rule 1(b) of the Rules…