Ramiro Trujillo Hernandez v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20251:25-cv-01711California648 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAMIRO TRUJILLO HERNANDEZ, No. 1:25-cv-1711-WBS-SCR 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14

WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE

15 ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY, et al., 16 Respondents. 17 18 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ 19 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 together with a motion to proceed in forma 20 pauperis. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to 21 afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. See 22 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 23 Petitioner has also requested the appointment of counsel. In light of the complexity of the 24 legal issues involved and petitioner’s demonstration of indigency, the court has determined that 25 the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see 26 also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). The court appoints the Office of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.