Cueva

Paul David Carr v. Cueva, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20252:24-cv-01680California2,658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL DAVID CARR, No. 2:24-cv-1680 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CUEVA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions for a protective order or injunction and for an extension of time to file a notice of election. ECF Nos. 52, 53. I. Background The court has previously screened three complaints and ruled on three motions for temporary restraining orders and/or preliminary injunctions, three requests for rulings, a motion for reconsideration, two motions to appoint experts, and a motion for a stay. ECF Nos. 11, 12, 22, 27, 37, 38, 44, 45, 51. The court has also granted six motions for extensions of time. ECF Nos. 16, 20, 24, 30, 33, 41. A. Screening Order on Third Amended Complaint Upon screening of the TAC, the undersigned found that plaintiff had sufficiently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.