Brazil

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM MICHAEL KENDALL, No. 2:24-cv-3801 DAD CSK P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS BRAZIL, et al., Defendants. 16 On September 2, 2025, this Court dismissed plaintiff’s first amended complaint and granted plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 26.) On October 3, 2025, plaintiff was granted an additional sixty days in which to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 30.) Sixty days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In recommending this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the Court has considered “(1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on their merits; and (5) the availability of less drastic alternatives.” Ferdik v. 26 …