Matteson

Antonio D. Pennyman v. G. Matteson, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20252:25-cv-00228California5,358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO D. PENNYMAN, No. 2:25-cv-00228 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. MATTESON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prison and proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint is before the undersigned for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff will be given leave to file an amended complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. He has submitted a declaration showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This means that plaintiff is allowed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.