Jean-Paul Prentice, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank NA., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20252:25-cv-01276California4,112 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN-PAUL PRENTICE, et al., No. 2:25-cv-01276-DJC-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS WELLS FARGO BANK NA., et al., (ECF Nos. 13, 16) Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Jean-Paul Prentice and Virginia G. Prentice proceed without counsel and seek relief under the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq.).1 Presently before the Court is defendants Leaf Filter North, LLC and Leaf Filter Int’l, Inc.’s (“Leaf Filter”) motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 13.) Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA. (“Wells Fargo”) has requested to join in the motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 16.) This motion is fully briefed. (See ECF Nos. 29-31.) The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(c). (ECF No. 18.) For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion should be GRANTED. I. Background A. Procedural Background Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.