Angelo J. Andrews v. Sacramento Sheriff County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20252:25-cv-01903California515 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELO J. ANDREWS, No. 2:25-cv-01903-DC-SCR (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO SHERIFF COUNTY JAIL, (Doc. No. 4) 15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner Angelo J. Andrews, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 3, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on Petitioner and contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (Doc. No. 4.) Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and the time to do so has passed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a de novo review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.