Warden

Hiuver Armando Castro Maradiaga v. Warden of Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20251:25-cv-01779California618 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HIUVER ARMANDO CASTRO Case No. 1:25-cv-1779-DJC-JDP (P)

MARADIAGA,

12 Petitioner, ORDER v.

WARDEN OF GOLDEN STATE ANNEX

DETENTION FACILITY, et al., Respondents. 17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, and a motion for appointed counsel, ECF No. 3. The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.1 Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing and is granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3, will also be granted. In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has

1 Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.