Enrique Morales Sanchez v. Warden of the Golden State Annex, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20251:25-cv-01811California792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ENRIQUE MORALES SANCHEZ No. 1:25-cv-01811-TLN-CSK Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX, et al., 14 Respondents.

16 Petitioner Enrique Morales Sanchez (“Petitioner”), an immigration detainee who is 17 representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 18 Based on the facts surrounding Petitioner’s detention, the Court provisionally authorizes 19 Petitioner to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of the filing fee in this action. See 28

U.S.C. § 1914.

21 In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the Court has determined that the 22 interests of justice require the appointment of counsel for Petitioner. See 18 U.S.C. § 23 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Within three 24 days from the date of this order, the appointing authority for the Eastern District of California 25 shall identify counsel and send counsel’s contact information to Michele Krueger,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.