Ebert

Benjamin Robert Gallegos v. B. Ebert

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20252:24-cv-01676California2,665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN ROBERT GALLEGOS, Case No. 2:24-cv-1676-DJC-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS B. EBERT, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, alleges that defendant Ebert retaliated against him in violation of the First Amendment. Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff filed an opposition, ECF No. 29, defendant filed a reply, ECF No. 31, and plaintiff filed a sur-reply, ECF No. 32, which the court has considered. I recommend that defendant’s motion to dismiss be denied. Allegations Plaintiff brings a single First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Ebert, the Litigation Coordinator for California Medical Facility (“CMF”). ECF No. 1. Plaintiff was housed at CMF in February 2024 and alleges that during that time, he was litigating, pro se, the guilt phase of his criminal case. Id. at 4. The criminal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.