Greenwall

Billy Driver v. CDCR Green Wall, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20252:25-cv-03019California2,145 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, No. 2:25-cv-3019 DC CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CDCR GREEN WALL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. As discussed below, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred, plaintiff’s request to file a complaint by mail is denied, and plaintiff is granted leave to file a civil rights complaint on the court’s form. I. REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS First, on October 27, 2025, plaintiff was ordered to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the court’s filing fee. On November 5, 2025, plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. On November 7, 2025, the CDCR filed plaintiff’s certified trust account statement. (ECF No. 7.) In plaintiff’s prior case, Driver v. U.S. Special Master, No. 1:17-cv-0202 DAD BAM P (E.D. Cal. May 2, 2017),1 plaintiff was found to have sustained three 26 A court may take judicial notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.