Rudas

Jose Conrado Perez v. Robert Rudas, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20252:25-cv-03172California535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE CONRADO PEREZ, No. 2:25-cv-3172 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT RUDAS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the following reasons, no further orders will issue addressing the pleading filed by plaintiff on December 4, 2025 docketed as “Notice by Jose Conrado Perez re health conditions.” (ECF No. 16.) This action proceeds on plaintiff’s complaint filed October 31, 2025 against defendant Dr. Robert Rudas employed at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”). (ECF No. 17 at 1.) Plaintiff claims that defendant Rudas provided inadequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment during and after the removal of plaintiff’s ingrown toenail, causing the amputation of plaintiff’s toe. (Id.) In the pleading filed December 4, 2025, plaintiff states that on November 17, 2025, plaintiff had a “real bad…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.