Lacewell

Navdeep Sandhu v. Andrew Lacewell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20252:25-cv-03575California710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NAVDEEP SANDHU,

Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-03575-TLN-CKD

13 v. ORDER

ANDREW LACEWELL,

15 Defendant.

17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Andrew Lacewell’s (“Defendant’s”) Notice of Removal and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby REMANDS the action to the Solano County Superior Court due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On November 21, 2025, Plaintiff Navdeep Sandhu (“Plaintiff”) brought an action for unlawful detainer against Defendant in Solano County Superior Court for possession of real property known as 264 Bridgewater Circle, Suisun City, California (the “Property”). (ECF No. 1 at 10.) On December 11, 2025, Defendant filed a Notice of Removal. (See generally id.) 28 U.S.C. § 1441 permits the removal to federal court of any civil action over which “the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction.” 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). Courts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.