Kelly-Leppert

In re: Roundup Products Liability Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20253:21-cv-02910California720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

REMAND ORDER

Before the Panel:* Plaintiff Consuela E. Kelly-Leppert, who is proceeding pro se, moves under Panel Rule 10.2 to vacate our order that conditionally remanded the Kelly-Leppert action listed on Schedule A to the Eastern District of Missouri. No party responded to the motion.

After considering the plaintiff’s arguments, the Panel finds that remand of this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is warranted. In considering the question of remand, the Panel consistently gives great weight to the transferee judge’s determination that remand of a particular action at a particular time is appropriate because the transferee judge, after all, supervises the litigation’s pretrial proceedings. See, e.g., In re Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. Qui Tam Litig. (No. II), 560 F. Supp. 2d 1349, 1350 (J.P.M.L. 2008). The transferee judge’s suggestion of remand indicates that “he perceives his role under Section 1407 to have ended.” In re Holiday Magic Sec. & Antitrust Litig., 433 F. Supp. 1125, 1126 (J.P.M.L. 1977). Here, the transferee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.