Stephens

Nicholas Stephens v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20253:23-cv-06081California4,353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NICHOLAS STEPHENS, Case No. 3:23-cv-06081-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 118, 123 Defendant.

12 Nicholas Stephens, who is representing himself, filed this negligence/personal injury action against his former employer United Parcel Service (“UPS”) following an incident in which another UPS employee assaulted him. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgement are pending before the Court. (Dkt. Nos. 118, 123.1) After carefully considering the arguments and briefing submitted, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS UPS’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s sole claim for negligence/personal injury is barred by the workers’ compensation exclusivity rule so his only remedy is through workers’ compensation, not a damages action in this Court. SUMMARY JUDGMENT RECORD Plaintiff was hired…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.