Nordheim
Odin Nordheim v. EOIR, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ODIN NORDHEIM, Pro Se Case No. 25-cv-08649-TLT
Plaintiff,
ORDER SCREENING AND
v. DISMISSING THIRD AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF
EOIR, et al., SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
12 Self-represented litigant Odin Nordheim (“Plaintiff”) seeks a writ of mandamus regarding adjudication of his asylum application by the immigration court. His second and third amended complaint are now subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 screening. The operative complaint challenges the immigration court’s scheduling decisions. Because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over claims arising from removal proceedings, Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”), ECF 28, third amended complaint (“TAC”), ECF 30, first motion to expedite, ECF 29, second motion to expedite, ECF 32, motion for miscellaneous…