McKeown
Kristine McKeown v. SAS Retail Services, LLC, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KRISTINE MCKEOWN, Case No. 25-cv-03654-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION
v. Re: Dkt. No. 10 SAS RETAIL SERVICES, LLC, et al., Defendants.
12 Pending before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendants SAS Retail Services LLC, Daymon Worldwide Inc., and Advantage Solutions, Inc. Dkt. No. 10. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to compel arbitration. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Kristine McKeown initially filed this putative wage-and-hour class action in Alameda Superior Court. See Dkt. No. 1-2, Ex. B (“Compl.”). Plaintiff alleges that Defendant SAS “provides retail merchandise stocking services” to retail stores throughout California. Id. at ¶ 18. Plaintiff contends that as a “merchandise stocker” for SAS, she was…