Dubinina
Tayisiya Dubinina, et al. v. Don Heinsohn, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAYISIYA DUBININA, et al., Case No. 25-cv-10542-JST
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
v. ORDER; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE
DON HEINSOHN, et al., DISMISSED Defendants. Re: ECF No.
12 Plaintiffs Tayisiya Dubinina and Olena Cherednychenko have filed this case, along with a motion for a temporary restraining order, seeking to prevent enforcement of a November 14, 2025 order and a subpoena issued to Defendant Wells Fargo Bank in San Mateo Superior Court Case No. 17-FAM-02049. The Court will deny the motion and order Plaintiffs to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. Even though Plaintiffs are representing themselves without an attorney, they must still follow all applicable federal and local rules. Civil L.R. 3-9(a). Under Civil Local Rule 65-1(a)(5), “[a] motion for temporary restraining order must be accompanied by . . . [a] declaration . . . 21…