Hosseinian

United States v. Hosseinian

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 202524-5821California783 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-5821 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:23-cr-00425-MCS-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

SHAHRAM HOSSEINIAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Mark C. Scarsi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 1, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, OWENS, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Shahram Hosseinian appeals from his sentence for distribution of

child pornography. First, he argues that the government breached their plea

agreement by failing to explicitly recommend a “low-end guideline sentence” at

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the sentencing hearing. Second, he argues that a supervised release condition that

will require him to pay for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.