Hardeep Singh v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 202516-72119California804 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARDEEP SINGH, No. 16-72119 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-586-797 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 10, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Hardeep Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (IJ)

denial of his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

Convention Against Torture (CAT). “Where . . . the BIA agrees with the IJ’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). reasoning, we review both decisions.” Garcia-Martinez v. Sessions, 886 F.3d 1291,

1293…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.