Hardeep Singh v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 202516-72119California804 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 15 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HARDEEP SINGH, No. 16-72119 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-586-797 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 10, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: M. SMITH, CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Hardeep Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board
of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (IJ)
denial of his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the
Convention Against Torture (CAT). “Where . . . the BIA agrees with the IJ’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). reasoning, we review both decisions.” Garcia-Martinez v. Sessions, 886 F.3d 1291,