Bondi

Carvalho Dos Reis v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 202524-7719California859 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TAINAN SANTOS CARVALHO DOS No. 24-7719 REIS; ODIRLEI CANDIDO DOS REIS; E. Agency Nos.

S. D. R., A220-894-906

A220-894-905

Petitioners,

A220-894-907

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 9, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: BUMATAY, JOHNSTONE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Tainan Santos-Carvalho Dos Reis (“Tainan”), her husband

Odirlei Candido-Dos Reis (“Odirlei”) (together, “Petitioners”), and their minor

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). child E.S.D.R.1 are citizens of Brazil. They seek review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.