Jason Gold v. Cerence Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20252:25-cv-05039California4,031 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION — LOS ANGELES Il || JASON GOLD, Case No. 2:25-cv-05039-ODW-MBK Plaintiff, (RROPOSKD) STIPULATED |I vy. || CERENCE INC., a Delaware Judge: Otis D. Wright, III corporation, Magistrate Judge: Michael B. Kaufman Petencant Complaint Scrved: lune’ 18,3025 17 || 1. GENERAL 1. Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to □□□□□ 20 || production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which speci || protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecutin 22 || this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to an || petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parti 24 || acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures « || responses to discovery and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.