Ethelbert Clay Sr. v. General Motors, LLC

I. BACKGROUND

According to Plaintiff's Complaint, Plaintiff purchased a motor vehicle manufactured and/or distributed by Defendant (“Vehicle”) on or around May 9, 2021. First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) § 9, Dkt. No. 1-2. In connection with the purchase, Plaintiff received various express warranties. Jd. § 11. During Plaintiff’s ownership of the Vehicle, it allegedly manifested an electrical defect covered by the warranties. Jd. § 12. Plaintiff delivered the Vehicle to Defendant and/or its authorized service and repair facilities for diagnosis and repair of the defects, but the Vehicle allegedly was not serviced or repaired to conform to the applicable express warranties after a reasonable number of opportunities to do so. Jd. □□ 13- 14.

Based on these allegations, Plaintiff claims violations of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“SBA”), California Civil Code §§ 1791.1, 1793.2, 1794, and violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (“MMWA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2301–2312, violation of the Uniform Commercial Code, and violation of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Civil Code § 1750, et seq. See generally id. Plaintiff commenced this action in the Los Angeles…