Secretary
Colton James Rood v. Carrillo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 COLTON JAMES ROOD, No. 1:22-cv-00449-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
v. (ECF No. 78) CARRILLO, Defendant. 14 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel, filed March 10, 2025. (ECF No. 78.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on May 9, 2025, along with a separate motion to extend the deadline for his discovery responses. (ECF Nos. 84, 85.) Defendant filed a reply on May 19, 2025. (ECF No. 89.) On May 27, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to extend the time to respond to Defendant’s discovery requests until 14 days after the Court rules on Defendant’s motion to compel in ECF No. 78 or 14 days after Court has rules on Defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment in ECF No. 77, whichever is later. (ECF No. 92.) I. …