Celestial Garrett v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20252:25-cv-09424California1,443 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV-25-09424-AGR Date: December 15, 2025 Title Celestial Garrett v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Present: The Honorable: Alicia G. Rosenberg, United States Magistrate Judge

K. Lozada n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: n/a n/a

Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND (Dkt. No. 9)

On October 2, 2025, Defendant Costco Wholesale Corp. (“Costco”) removed this action from Superior Court on the basis of diversity of citizenship. (Dkt. No. 1.)

Plaintiff filed a motion to remand this action to Superior Court. (Dkt. No. 9.) Costco filed an opposition. (Dkt. No. 10.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (Dkt. No. 11.) The motion is appropriate for adjudication without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15.

Plaintiff contends that Costco’s notice of removal was untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(1), which provides: “A case may not be removed under subsection (b)(3) on the basis of jurisdiction conferred by section 1332 more than 1 year after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.