Cervantes

Mercedes Cervantes v. County of San Diego; and Does 1–40, inclusive

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20253:25-cv-00275California2,062 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MERCEDES CERVANTES, Case No.: 3:25-cv-00275-H-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

CERTIFICATION UNDER 29 U.S.C.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; and DOES § 216(b) 1–40, inclusive, 14 Defendants. [Doc. No. 20]

On February 6, 2025, Plaintiff Mercedes Cervantes filed a complaint against the County of San Diego, alleging violations of the Federal Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq., for failure to pay overtime compensation. (Doc. No. 1, Complaint.) On March 17, 2025, Defendant County of San Diego filed its answer. (Doc. No. 4, Answer.) On October 20, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary certification under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). (Doc. No. 20.) On November 24, 2025, Defendant filed a response in opposition. (Doc. No. 22.) On December 8, 2025, the Court held a hearing on the motion. (Doc. No. 24.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. / / / / / / 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.