Dean

Keith Dean v. D. Samuels, Warden, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20253:25-cv-02296California2,762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH DEAN, Case No.: 25cv2296-RSH-JLB

CDCR #AD-6708,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

D. SAMUELS, Warden, et al.,

AND Defendants. 16 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b) 18 19 Plaintiff Keith Dean, a state inmate incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1; 2. I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $405, consisting of a $350 statutory fee plus an additional administrative fee of $55, although the administrative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.