Burgess
Sara Burgess, et al. v. Alternative Sierra Investments, LLC, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SARA BURGESS, et al., No. 1:23-cv-01641 JLT BAM Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING
v. ALTERNATIVE SIERRA INVESTMENTS,
LLC LEAVE TO FILE THIRD-PARTY
ALTERNATIVE SIERRA COMPLAINT INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., (Docs. 98, 103) Defendants. 14
AND RELATED CROSSCLAIMS
16 This action arises under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 to 9675. Plaintiffs, who have settled their claims, alleged that Heritage Dry Cleaners was the source of the alleged contamination of tetrachloroethylene and its breakdown chemical trichloroethylene on and under the property that remains present in the groundwater below the property and is migrating to or from the property. The only remaining claims at issue are the respective crossclaims of Alternative Sierra Investments, LLC (“ASI”) and Frederick and Judy A. Wentworth. On August 5,…