Boza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Yesica L. BOZA, Case No.: 25-cv-3526-AGS-SBC Plaintiff ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

v.

ORDER (ECF 2)

Pamela BONDI, et al., Defendants. 8 Plaintiff Yesica Boza requests a temporary restraining order precluding defendants “from detaining her” at her “adjustment of status interview” tomorrow (“December 16, 2025”). (ECF 2, at 2–3.) Because Boza fails to establish that she is likely to suffer imminent harm, her motion is denied. Rather than contend with the merits of the claim, defendants assert that “the Court lacks jurisdiction to issue a temporary restraining order,” because plaintiffs have not properly “[s]erved” defendants. (ECF 5, at 2.) After all, service is typically a precondition to exercising personal jurisdiction. See Murphy Bros., Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350 (1999) (noting that one “becomes a party officially, and is required to take action in that capacity, only upon service of…