Yang

Larry James Porter v. Yang, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20251:25-cv-00311California1,189 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY JAMES PORTER, Case No. 1:25-cv-00311-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION YANG, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

Defendants. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO OBEY COURT ORDER

16 (ECF No. 10)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 I. Background Plaintiff Larry James Porter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 3, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it stated cognizable claims against Defendant Jane Doe Sergeant for deliberate indifference to medical need and conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment and a claim against California Department of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.