Grigsby
Calvin B. Grigsby v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CALVIN B. GRIGSBY, Case No. 25-cv-00192-DMR
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 23 Defendants.
On August 19, 2025, the court denied Plaintiff Calvin Grigsby’s motion for summary judgment, which was styled as a “motion for expedited processing (Rule 56).” [Docket No. 22 (Order); see Docket No. 16 (MSJ).] Grigsby now seeks leave to file a motion for reconsideration of that Order. [Docket No. 23 (Mot.).] This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), 7-9(d). For the following reasons, Grigsby’s motion for reconsideration is denied. I. BACKGROUND The Order sets forth a detailed factual history of this case. Order at 1–4. As is relevant here, on May 28, 2025, Grigsby filed a motion for summary judgment which sought expedited processing of his Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”)…