P.
Andrew P., et al. v. Blue Cross of California DBA as Anthem Blue Cross
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ANDREW P., et al., Case No. 5:25-cv-02158-BLF
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA DBA AS [Re: ECF No. 38]
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS,
11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is Defendant Blue Cross of California’s (“Blue Cross’s”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Andrew P. and L.P.’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 38 (“Mot.”); see also ECF No. 45 (“Reply”). Plaintiffs oppose the motion. See ECF No. 44 (“Opp.”). The Court heard oral argument on December 12, 2025. ECF No. 55. The motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Through his employment, Andrew P. has been a participant in the Anthem Platinum PPO 15/250/10% Plan (“Plan”), a welfare benefits plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and administered by Blue Cross. ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 5, 7. Andrew P. is the father of L.P., who is a…