Noem

Veronica V.O. v. Kristi Noem et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20251:25-cv-01796California3,013 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VERONICA V.O.1,

Petitioner, No. 1:25-cv-01796-TLN-JDP

13 v. ORDER KRISTI NOEM et al., 15 Respondents.

17 This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Veronica V.O.’s (“Petitioner”) Ex Parte Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). (ECF No. 8.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s Motion is GRANTED. /// /// ///

As recommended by the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States, the Court omits Petitioner’s full name, using only 26 her first name and last initials, to protect sensitive personal information. See Memorandum Re: Privacy Concern Regarding Social Security and Immigration Opinions, Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, Judicial Conference of the United States (May 1, 2018), https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/18-cv-l-suggestion_cacm_0.pdf. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Petitioner is a forty-nine-year-old…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.