Shan

Dwyane M. Wright v. Shan, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20252:25-cv-00689California1,248 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DWYANE M. WRIGHT, No. 2:25-cv-00689-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SHAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Dwyane M. Wright, who proceeds without counsel, initiated this action by filing a fee-paid complaint on February 27, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) On July 1, 2025, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff requested an extension of time to serve defendants on July 23, 2025 (ECF No. 12), which the Court granted (ECF No. 13). On November 6, 2025, plaintiff filed a motion to consolidate cases, which is now before the Court. (ECF No. 16.) For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends denying plaintiff’s request to consolidate cases, but recommends relating the cases. I. Legal Standards Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) allows courts to consolidate actions involving a common question of law or fact. “The district court has broad discretion under this rule to consolidate cases pending in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.